| _id | name | about | type | dataset | meta | sparql | country | region | bbox | updated_at | created_at | __v |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5dd3c72015ba431f9d9dfe4d
|
Discriminatory Family Code - Inheritance Rights o…
|
This indicator was a sub-component of the Discrim…
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c71f15ba431f9d9dfe45
|
{
"indicator": {
"label": "Discriminatory Family Code - Inheritance Rights of Women",
"description": "This indicator was a sub-component of the Discriminatory Family Code Index in the Gender Institutions and Development Database in the 2009 edition. It ranges from 0 (same inheritance rights to both Women and men) to 1 (The law does not guarantee the same inheritance rights to widows and widowers, or widows have no inheritance rights at all). In the 2012 edition of the same database made by OECD, this index was splitted into two separated sub-component: 1) Discriminatory Familiy Code - Inheritance Rights of Widows 2) Discriminatory Familiy Code - Inheritance Rights of Daughters",
"id": "OECD-SIGI-8",
"dataset": "OECD-SIGI",
"measurement_unit": "Index (0; 1)",
"picture": "",
"related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;women;gender equity in access to land;land inheritance rights;",
"related_themes": "Socio-Economic & Institutional Context;Land & Gender;",
"related_overarching_categories": ""
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "OECD-SIGI-8"
}
|
AFG,AGO,ALB,ARE,ARG,ARM,AZE,BDI,BEN,BFA,BGD,BHR,B…
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:40 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:40 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
||
5dd3c72115ba431f9d9dfe4e
|
Discriminatory Familiy Code - Inheritance Rights …
|
This indicator is a sub-component of the Discrimi…
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c71f15ba431f9d9dfe45
|
{
"indicator": {
"label": "Discriminatory Familiy Code - Inheritance Rights of Daughters",
"description": "This indicator is a sub-component of the Discriminatory Family Code Indicator and measures whether daughters and sons have equal inheritance rights. It ranges from 0 (same inheritance rights for both daughters and sons) to one (The law does not guarantee the same inheritance rights to daughters and sons, or daughters have no inheritance rights at all).",
"id": "OECD-SIGI-9",
"dataset": "OECD-SIGI",
"measurement_unit": "Index (0; 1)",
"picture": "",
"related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;women;gender equity in access to land;land inheritance rights;land tenure;",
"related_themes": "Socio-Economic & Institutional Context;Land & Gender;",
"related_overarching_categories": ""
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "OECD-SIGI-9"
}
|
AFG,AGO,ALB,ARE,ARG,ARM,AUS,AUT,AZE,BDI,BEL,BEN,B…
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
||
5dd3c72115ba431f9d9dfe4f
|
Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI)
|
The SIGI is built on 12 innovative indicators on …
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c71f15ba431f9d9dfe45
|
{
"indicator": {
"label": "Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI)",
"description": "The SIGI is built on 12 innovative indicators on social institutions, which are grouped into 5 categories / subindexes: Family Code, Physical Integrity, Son Preference, Civil Liberties and Ownership Rights. Each of the SIGI indicators is coded between 0, meaning no or very low inequality, and 1, indicating very high inequality.",
"id": "OECD-SIGI-0",
"dataset": "OECD-SIGI",
"measurement_unit": "Index (0; 1)",
"picture": "",
"related_landvoc_concepts": "land ownership;women;gender equity in access to land;land tenure;",
"related_themes": "Socio-Economic & Institutional Context;Land & Gender;",
"related_overarching_categories": ""
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "OECD-SIGI-0"
}
|
AFG,ALB,ARE,ARG,ARM,AZE,BDI,BEN,BFA,BGD,BHR,BLR,B…
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
||
5dd3c72115ba431f9d9dfe50
|
Global Ranking of Restricted Resources and Entitl…
|
Global Rank of Restricted Resources and Entitleme…
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c71f15ba431f9d9dfe45
|
{
"indicator": {
"label": "Global Ranking of Restricted Resources and Entitlements",
"description": "Global Rank of Restricted Resources and Entitlements index, a sub-index of the Social Insititution and Gender Index (SIGI).",
"id": "OECD-SIGI-7",
"dataset": "OECD-SIGI",
"measurement_unit": "Rank",
"picture": "",
"related_landvoc_concepts": "sustainable development;women;gender equity in access to land;land registration;",
"related_themes": "Land & Gender;",
"related_overarching_categories": ""
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "OECD-SIGI-7"
}
|
AFG,AGO,ALB,ARE,ARG,ARM,AZE,BDI,BEN,BFA,BGD,BHR,B…
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
||
5dd3c72115ba431f9d9dfe51
|
Restricted Resources and Entitlements
|
The indicator is a component of the SIGI - Social…
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c71f15ba431f9d9dfe45
|
{
"indicator": {
"label": "Restricted Resources and Entitlements",
"description": "The indicator is a component of the SIGI - Social Institutions and Gender Index and measures whether women and men have equal and secure access to land use, control and ownership. The Restricted Resources and Entitlements - ranging from 0 (the law guarantees the same rights to own, use and control land to both women and men) to 1 (The law does not guarantee the same rights to own) is calculated considerig three dimensions: 1) Women Access to Land: whether women and men have equal and secure access to land use, control and ownership. 2) Women access to non-land assets: whether women and men have equal and secure access to non-land assets use, control and ownership. 3) Access to financial services: whether women and men have equal access to financial services",
"id": "OECD-SIGI-6",
"dataset": "OECD-SIGI",
"measurement_unit": "Index (0; 1)",
"picture": "",
"related_landvoc_concepts": "women;gender equity in access to land;land titling;security of tenure (land);land tenure;",
"related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions;Land & Gender;",
"related_overarching_categories": ""
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "OECD-SIGI-6"
}
|
AFG,AGO,ALB,ARE,ARG,ARM,AZE,BDI,BEN,BFA,BGD,BHR,B…
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
||
5dd3c72115ba431f9d9dfe52
|
Restricted Resources and Entitlements - Land Titl…
|
This indicator is taken from the OECD the Gender,…
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c71f15ba431f9d9dfe45
|
{
"indicator": {
"label": "Restricted Resources and Entitlements - Land Titles Owned by Women",
"description": "This indicator is taken from the OECD the Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB). It is and index ranging from 0 to 1.",
"id": "OECD-SIGI-12",
"dataset": "OECD-SIGI",
"measurement_unit": "",
"picture": "",
"related_landvoc_concepts": "women;land distribution;land ownership;land access;land governance;land policies;land rights;gender equity in access to land;",
"related_themes": "Land & Gender;Land Stakeholders & Institutions;",
"related_overarching_categories": ""
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "OECD-SIGI-12"
}
|
ARG,AUT,BEL,BGD,BGR,BWA,CHL,CIV,CYP,CZE,DEU,DNK,E…
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:42:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
||
5dd3c74615ba431f9d9dfe5d
|
Perceived tenure security (house owners)
|
This indicator expresses the percentage of respon…
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c74515ba431f9d9dfe5b
|
{
"indicator": {
"related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;security of tenure (land)",
"related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
"related_overarching_categories": "",
"high_low": "",
"has_coded_value": "",
"measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
"max": null,
"min": null,
"id": "LA-PRI-I.OW",
"dataset": "LA-PRI",
"picture": "",
"description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents -- house owners only -- feeling "insecure" . For the PRIndex nine-country pilot study, respondents perceptions of their tenure security were assessed using the following two questions: Question 1: Do you think it is at all possible that you, personally, could lose the right to live in this home against your will in the next five years? Against your will means you are not given a choice and you have to stop living in this home. Question 2: [If yes to question 1] Do you think this will probably happen in the next five years, or not? The results are used to place owners and renters in each country into three tenure security categories: - Secure: Those who simply answer no to the first question, indicating they do not believe it is possible they could lose the right to live in their home against their will in the next five years. These respondents were not asked the second question above. Those who said they dont know or did not answer this question were removed from the results, while those who said it is possible moved on to question 2. - Somewhat insecure: Those who said it is possible that they could lose the right to live in their homes against their will in the next five years, but that it is not probable (i.e., they said no to the second question), or who say it is possible but are unsure whether or not it is probable (i.e., they said dont know or did not respond to the second question). - Very insecure: Those who said it is both possible and probable that they will lose the right to live in their homes in the next five years. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
"label": "Perceived tenure security (house owners)"
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "LA-PRI-I.OW"
}
|
BRA,COL,EGY,GRC,IDN,NGA,PER,TZA
|
Mon Nov 25 2019 15:21:29 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:43:18 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
||
5dd3c74615ba431f9d9dfe5e
|
Perceived tenure security (house renters)
|
This indicator expresses the percentage of respon…
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c74515ba431f9d9dfe5b
|
{
"indicator": {
"related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;security of tenure (land)",
"related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
"related_overarching_categories": "",
"high_low": "",
"has_coded_value": "",
"measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
"max": null,
"min": null,
"id": "LA-PRI-I.RE",
"dataset": "LA-PRI",
"picture": "",
"description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents -- house renters only -- feeling "secure". For the PRIndex nine-country pilot study, respondents perceptions of their tenure security were assessed using the following two questions: Question 1: Do you think it is at all possible that you, personally, could lose the right to live in this home against your will in the next five years? Against your will means you are not given a choice and you have to stop living in this home. Question 2: [If yes to question 1] Do you think this will probably happen in the next five years, or not? The results are used to place owners and renters in each country into three tenure security categories: - Secure: Those who simply answer no to the first question, indicating they do not believe it is possible they could lose the right to live in their home against their will in the next five years. These respondents were not asked the second question above. Those who said they dont know or did not answer this question were removed from the results, while those who said it is possible moved on to question 2. - Somewhat insecure: Those who said it is possible that they could lose the right to live in their homes against their will in the next five years, but that it is not probable (i.e., they said no to the second question), or who say it is possible but are unsure whether or not it is probable (i.e., they said dont know or did not respond to the second question). - Very insecure: Those who said it is both possible and probable that they will lose the right to live in their homes in the next five years. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
"label": "Perceived tenure security (house renters)"
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "LA-PRI-I.RE"
}
|
BRA,COL,EGY,GRC,IDN,NGA,PER,TZA
|
Mon Nov 25 2019 15:21:18 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:43:18 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
||
5dd3c74615ba431f9d9dfe5f
|
Perceived tenure security (all respondents)
|
This indicator expresses the percentage of respon…
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c74515ba431f9d9dfe5b
|
{
"indicator": {
"related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;security of tenure (land)",
"related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
"related_overarching_categories": "",
"high_low": "",
"has_coded_value": "",
"measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
"max": null,
"min": null,
"id": "LA-PRI-I.T",
"dataset": "LA-PRI",
"picture": "",
"description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents feeling "secure". For the PRIndex nine-country pilot study, respondents perceptions of their tenure security were assessed using the following two questions: Question 1: Do you think it is at all possible that you, personally, could lose the right to live in this home against your will in the next five years? Against your will means you are not given a choice and you have to stop living in this home. Question 2: [If yes to question 1] Do you think this will probably happen in the next five years, or not? The results are used to place owners and renters in each country into three tenure security categories: - Secure: Those who simply answer no to the first question, indicating they do not believe it is possible they could lose the right to live in their home against their will in the next five years. These respondents were not asked the second question above. Those who said they dont know or did not answer this question were removed from the results, while those who said it is possible moved on to question 2. - Somewhat insecure: Those who said it is possible that they could lose the right to live in their homes against their will in the next five years, but that it is not probable (i.e., they said no to the second question), or who say it is possible but are unsure whether or not it is probable (i.e., they said dont know or did not respond to the second question). - Very insecure: Those who said it is both possible and probable that they will lose the right to live in their homes in the next five years. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
"label": "Perceived tenure security (all respondents)"
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "LA-PRI-I.T"
}
|
BRA,COL,EGY,GRC,IDN,NGA,PER,TZA
|
Mon Nov 25 2019 15:20:59 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:43:18 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
||
5dd3c74615ba431f9d9dfe60
|
Tenure Security perceived as "somewhat insecure" …
|
This indicator expresses the percentage of respon…
|
SPARQL
|
5dd3c74515ba431f9d9dfe5b
|
{
"indicator": {
"related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;security of tenure (land)",
"related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
"related_overarching_categories": "",
"high_low": "",
"has_coded_value": "",
"measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
"max": null,
"min": null,
"id": "LA-PRI-II.OW",
"dataset": "LA-PRI",
"picture": "",
"description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents -- house owners only -- feeling "somewhat secure". For the PRIndex nine-country pilot study, respondents perceptions of their tenure security were assessed using the following two questions: Question 1: Do you think it is at all possible that you, personally, could lose the right to live in this home against your will in the next five years? Against your will means you are not given a choice and you have to stop living in this home. Question 2: [If yes to question 1] Do you think this will probably happen in the next five years, or not? The results are used to place owners and renters in each country into three tenure security categories: - Secure: Those who simply answer no to the first question, indicating they do not believe it is possible they could lose the right to live in their home against their will in the next five years. These respondents were not asked the second question above. Those who said they dont know or did not answer this question were removed from the results, while those who said it is possible moved on to question 2. - Somewhat insecure: Those who said it is possible that they could lose the right to live in their homes against their will in the next five years, but that it is not probable (i.e., they said no to the second question), or who say it is possible but are unsure whether or not it is probable (i.e., they said dont know or did not respond to the second question). - Very insecure: Those who said it is both possible and probable that they will lose the right to live in their homes in the next five years. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
"label": "Tenure Security perceived as \"somewhat insecure\" (house owners)"
}
}
|
{
"source_url": "LA-PRI-II.OW"
}
|
BRA,COL,EGY,GRC,IDN,NGA,PER,TZA
|
Mon Nov 25 2019 15:22:31 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
Tue Nov 19 2019 10:43:18 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
|
0
|
| Documents | 776 |
| Total doc size | 1.47 MB |
| Average doc size | 1.93 KB |
| Pre-allocated size | 524 KB |
| Indexes | 1 |
| Total index size | 36 KB |
| Padding factor | |
| Extents |
| Name | Columns | Size | Attributes | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| _id_ |
_id ASC
|
36 KB | DEL |