Viewing Collection: indicators

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;security of tenure (land)",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-II.RE",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents -- house renters only -- feeling "somewhat insecure". For the PRIndex nine-country pilot study, respondents perceptions of their tenure security were assessed using the following two questions: Question 1: Do you think it is at all possible that you, personally, could lose the right to live in this home against your will in the next five years? Against your will means you are not given a choice and you have to stop living in this home. Question 2: [If yes to question 1] Do you think this will probably happen in the next five years, or not? The results are used to place owners and renters in each country into three tenure security categories: - Secure: Those who simply answer no to the first question, indicating they do not believe it is possible they could lose the right to live in their home against their will in the next five years. These respondents were not asked the second question above. Those who said they dont know or did not answer this question were removed from the results, while those who said it is possible moved on to question 2. - Somewhat insecure: Those who said it is possible that they could lose the right to live in their homes against their will in the next five years, but that it is not probable (i.e., they said no to the second question), or who say it is possible but are unsure whether or not it is probable (i.e., they said dont know or did not respond to the second question). - Very insecure: Those who said it is both possible and probable that they will lose the right to live in their homes in the next five years. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Tenure Security perceived as \"somewhat insecure\" (house renters)"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-II.RE"
}

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;security of tenure (land)",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-II.T",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents feeling "somewhat insecure". For the PRIndex nine-country pilot study, respondents perceptions of their tenure security were assessed using the following two questions: Question 1: Do you think it is at all possible that you, personally, could lose the right to live in this home against your will in the next five years? Against your will means you are not given a choice and you have to stop living in this home. Question 2: [If yes to question 1] Do you think this will probably happen in the next five years, or not? The results are used to place owners and renters in each country into three tenure security categories: - Secure: Those who simply answer no to the first question, indicating they do not believe it is possible they could lose the right to live in their home against their will in the next five years. These respondents were not asked the second question above. Those who said they dont know or did not answer this question were removed from the results, while those who said it is possible moved on to question 2. - Somewhat insecure: Those who said it is possible that they could lose the right to live in their homes against their will in the next five years, but that it is not probable (i.e., they said no to the second question), or who say it is possible but are unsure whether or not it is probable (i.e., they said dont know or did not respond to the second question). - Very insecure: Those who said it is both possible and probable that they will lose the right to live in their homes in the next five years. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Tenure Security perceived as \"somewhat insecure\" (all respondents)"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-II.T"
}

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;land rights;security of tenure (land)",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-III.OW",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents -- house owners only -- feeling "insecure". For the PRIndex nine-country pilot study, respondents perceptions of their tenure security were assessed using the following two questions: Question 1: Do you think it is at all possible that you, personally, could lose the right to live in this home against your will in the next five years? Against your will means you are not given a choice and you have to stop living in this home. Question 2: [If yes to question 1] Do you think this will probably happen in the next five years, or not? The results are used to place owners and renters in each country into three tenure security categories: - Secure: Those who simply answer no to the first question, indicating they do not believe it is possible they could lose the right to live in their home against their will in the next five years. These respondents were not asked the second question above. Those who said they dont know or did not answer this question were removed from the results, while those who said it is possible moved on to question 2. - Somewhat insecure: Those who said it is possible that they could lose the right to live in their homes against their will in the next five years, but that it is not probable (i.e., they said no to the second question), or who say it is possible but are unsure whether or not it is probable (i.e., they said dont know or did not respond to the second question). - Very insecure: Those who said it is both possible and probable that they will lose the right to live in their homes in the next five years. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Perceived tenure insecurity (house owners)"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-III.OW"
}

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;land rights;security of tenure (land)",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-III.RE",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents -- house renters only -- feeling "insecure". For the PRIndex nine-country pilot study, respondents perceptions of their tenure security were assessed using the following two questions: Question 1: Do you think it is at all possible that you, personally, could lose the right to live in this home against your will in the next five years? Against your will means you are not given a choice and you have to stop living in this home. Question 2: [If yes to question 1] Do you think this will probably happen in the next five years, or not? The results are used to place owners and renters in each country into three tenure security categories: - Secure: Those who simply answer no to the first question, indicating they do not believe it is possible they could lose the right to live in their home against their will in the next five years. These respondents were not asked the second question above. Those who said they dont know or did not answer this question were removed from the results, while those who said it is possible moved on to question 2. - Somewhat insecure: Those who said it is possible that they could lose the right to live in their homes against their will in the next five years, but that it is not probable (i.e., they said no to the second question), or who say it is possible but are unsure whether or not it is probable (i.e., they said dont know or did not respond to the second question). - Very insecure: Those who said it is both possible and probable that they will lose the right to live in their homes in the next five years. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Perceived tenure insecurity (house renters)"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-III.RE"
}

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;land rights;security of tenure (land)",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-III.T",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of total respondents feeling "secure". For the PRIndex nine-country pilot study, respondents perceptions of their tenure security were assessed using the following two questions: Question 1: Do you think it is at all possible that you, personally, could lose the right to live in this home against your will in the next five years? Against your will means you are not given a choice and you have to stop living in this home. Question 2: [If yes to question 1] Do you think this will probably happen in the next five years, or not? The results are used to place owners and renters in each country into three tenure security categories: - Secure: Those who simply answer no to the first question, indicating they do not believe it is possible they could lose the right to live in their home against their will in the next five years. These respondents were not asked the second question above. Those who said they dont know or did not answer this question were removed from the results, while those who said it is possible moved on to question 2. - Somewhat insecure: Those who said it is possible that they could lose the right to live in their homes against their will in the next five years, but that it is not probable (i.e., they said no to the second question), or who say it is possible but are unsure whether or not it is probable (i.e., they said dont know or did not respond to the second question). - Very insecure: Those who said it is both possible and probable that they will lose the right to live in their homes in the next five years. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Perceived tenure insecurity (all respondents)"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-III.T"
}

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;land registration",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-V.OW",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents who personally own their homes -- home owners only -- with informal documentation only. In all nine countries studied, residents who said they personally own or rent their homes were asked whether they had property documentation to support their right to live there. Questions about documentation were asked only to respondents who say they personally own or rent their homes, as opposed to those who say a family members owns or rents it.Those who indicated they did were asked about the type of document, with the results used to distinguish roughly between formal and informal records. - For homeowners, formal documents include a title, deed or some country-specific form of formal record. Any other document cited by respondents is regarded as informal. - For renters, a lease deed or agreement is the only type of document categorized for the purposes of this survey as formal.6 Any other type is regarded as informal. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Home owners (all) with Information Documentation only"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-V.OW"
}

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-V.RU",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents who personally own their homes -- rural residents only -- with informal documentation only. In all nine countries studied, residents who said they personally own or rent their homes were asked whether they had property documentation to support their right to live there. Questions about documentation were asked only to respondents who say they personally own or rent their homes, as opposed to those who say a family members owns or rents it.Those who indicated they did were asked about the type of document, with the results used to distinguish roughly between formal and informal records. - For homeowners, formal documents include a title, deed or some country-specific form of formal record. Any other document cited by respondents is regarded as informal. - For renters, a lease deed or agreement is the only type of document categorized for the purposes of this survey as formal.6 Any other type is regarded as informal. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Home owners (rural residents) with Information Documentation only"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-V.RU"
}

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;urban areas",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions;Urban Tenure",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-V.UR",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents who personally own their homes -- urban residents only -- with informal documentation only. In all nine countries studied, residents who said they personally own or rent their homes were asked whether they had property documentation to support their right to live there. Questions about documentation were asked only to respondents who say they personally own or rent their homes, as opposed to those who say a family members owns or rents it.Those who indicated they did were asked about the type of document, with the results used to distinguish roughly between formal and informal records. - For homeowners, formal documents include a title, deed or some country-specific form of formal record. Any other document cited by respondents is regarded as informal. - For renters, a lease deed or agreement is the only type of document categorized for the purposes of this survey as formal.6 Any other type is regarded as informal. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Home owners (urban residents) with Information Documentation only"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-V.UR"
}

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;land registration",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-VI.RU",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents who personally own their homes -- rural residents only -- with no documentation at all, neither formal nor informal. In all nine countries studied, residents who said they personally own or rent their homes were asked whether they had property documentation to support their right to live there. Questions about documentation were asked only to respondents who say they personally own or rent their homes, as opposed to those who say a family members owns or rents it.Those who indicated they did were asked about the type of document, with the results used to distinguish roughly between formal and informal records. - For homeowners, formal documents include a title, deed or some country-specific form of formal record. Any other document cited by respondents is regarded as informal. - For renters, a lease deed or agreement is the only type of document categorized for the purposes of this survey as formal.6 Any other type is regarded as informal. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Home owners (rural residents) with no documentation at all"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-VI.RU"
}

{
  "indicator": {
    "related_landvoc_concepts": "land governance;property;land ownership;land rights;urban areas",
    "related_themes": "Land Stakeholders & Institutions;Urban Tenure",
    "related_overarching_categories": "",
    "high_low": "",
    "has_coded_value": "",
    "measurement_unit": "Percentage (%)",
    "max": null,
    "min": null,
    "id": "LA-PRI-VI.UR",
    "dataset": "LA-PRI",
    "picture": "",
    "description": "This indicator expresses the percentage of respondents who personally own their homes -- urban residents only -- with no documentation at all, neither formal nor informal. In all nine countries studied, residents who said they personally own or rent their homes were asked whether they had property documentation to support their right to live there. Questions about documentation were asked only to respondents who say they personally own or rent their homes, as opposed to those who say a family members owns or rents it.Those who indicated they did were asked about the type of document, with the results used to distinguish roughly between formal and informal records. - For homeowners, formal documents include a title, deed or some country-specific form of formal record. Any other document cited by respondents is regarded as informal. - For renters, a lease deed or agreement is the only type of document categorized for the purposes of this survey as formal.6 Any other type is regarded as informal. Source: Gallup (2017), Global Property Rights Index 2016. Testing of a New Survey Module on Perceptions of Land Tenure Security in Nine Countries (Available here: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr...) The PRIndex data presented here -- originally created by by Land Alliance in association with Gallup, Inc. -- can be reused under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). For more information, please visit http://www.prindex.net/ or consult the following report: http://landportal.info/library/resources/global-property-rights-index-pr... .",
    "label": "Home owners (urban residents) with no documentation at all"
  }
}

{
  "source_url": "LA-PRI-VI.UR"
}